A review of repair scope, market closures and final invoices finds a gap between the total in the public summary and the conditions recorded at the repair counter at South Arch Market. The difference does not prove that anyone misstated the file. It shows what the public count leaves out: the repair contract lists parts but not the hours stalls must close.
The repair scope, market closures and final invoices lists 41 work orders with a closure period and a final amount; the previous window lists 39. Lucien Vale checked both against the original record checked against the date it was amended and used. The source was checked against a second copy held by Lucien Vale. No dated correction to either copy was present when the comparison closed.
The contractor prices materials and work. Sellers ask the board to disclose how long the aisle will be closed. The office has not supplied a separate measure that would settle the disagreement, so the two explanations remain competing accounts.
This report supports a narrower finding: the count is repeatable, but it is not enough to decide how sellers can plan around a repair price that does not show lost stall hours.
Asecond office compares arrival, service and publication times. The Year third, late winter window 1 file remains open for its scheduled decision. The next contract will list the work period separately from the material cost.
