A review of temporary addresses, service notices and lease copies finds a gap between the total in the public summary and the conditions recorded at the welcome desk at West Lantern House. The difference does not prove that anyone misstated the file. It shows what the public count leaves out: temporary addresses expire before the shared notice list is refreshed.
The temporary addresses, service notices and lease copies lists 66 new residents receiving a service notice before the first review date; the previous window lists 63. Lucien Vale checked both against the original record checked against the date it was amended and used. The source was checked against a second copy held by Iria Venn. No dated correction to either copy was present when the comparison closed.
The desk removes expired addresses for accuracy. Residents say the notice list should be refreshed before removal. The office has not supplied a separate measure that would settle the disagreement, so the two explanations remain competing accounts.
This report supports a narrower finding: the count is repeatable, but it is not enough to decide how residents receive a meeting notice when their first room is temporary.
Anew review window opens with a current date and a named record keeper. The Year fourth, long dusk window 1 file remains open for its scheduled decision. The intake desk will test a reminder before a temporary address expires.
