A review of clock calibration cards and service boards that use the signal finds a gap between the total in the public summary and the conditions recorded at the civic clock at South Arch. The difference does not prove that anyone misstated the file. It shows what the public count leaves out: the clock is adjusted while transit notices remain posted.
The clock calibration cards and service boards that use the signal lists 92 service boards with a matching calibration date; the previous window lists 94. Lucien Vale checked both against the original record checked against the date it was amended and used. The source was checked against a second copy held by Adrian Veil. No dated correction to either copy was present when the comparison closed.
The clock keeper trusts the calibration card. Residents rely on the displayed signal at the route entrance. The office has not supplied a separate measure that would settle the disagreement, so the two explanations remain competing accounts.
This report supports a narrower finding: the count is repeatable, but it is not enough to decide how a service announces its time while the public clock is being calibrated.
The clerk closes this file and opens the next window with a new date. The board closed this docket after it sent a separate date question to a new hearing without reopening this file. The next window starts with a fresh record.
