A review of the courtyard calendar and maintenance requests from residents finds a gap between the total in the public summary and the conditions recorded at the courtyard at Juniper House. The difference does not prove that anyone misstated the file. It shows what the public count leaves out: residents who keep different daily hours use the same warming room.
The the courtyard calendar and maintenance requests from residents lists 87 quiet hours that leave at least one shared interval open; the previous window lists 87. Sera Voss checked both against service hours compared with arrival records from the same window. The source was checked against a second copy held by Mira Noct. No dated correction to either copy was present when the comparison closed.
One group requests a single quiet block. Another says the block removes its only shared meal interval. The office has not supplied a separate measure that would settle the disagreement, so the two explanations remain competing accounts.
This report supports a narrower finding: the count is repeatable, but it is not enough to decide how a shared room can offer quiet and still remain open to neighbors.
The clerk closes this file and opens the next window with a new date. The board closed this docket after it approved a short trial with an end date and public review. The next window starts with a fresh record.
