A decision on the shared shade route should be judged at the covered path through the south ridge, where the rule changes an ordinary route, shift or service. Date every record and distinguish a current rule from a custom that has simply lasted a long time. The current file is the Year second, early thaw window 3 review, not a permanent settlement of every future case.
The route maintenance agreement and closure notices from both towns lists 85 closures posted at both route entrances before work begins; the previous window lists 79. Sera Voss checked both against service hours compared with arrival records from the same window. The difference matters because how travelers receive one closure time when the crews work on different schedules.
Each crew posts its own interval. Travelers ask which notice applies where the two sections meet. Those objections deserve a clear answer. They are not a reason to keep an uncheckable rule simply because its wording is familiar.
A useful decision names who will do the work, which count will change and when the result comes back to the public table. In this case, the path has two maintenance crews with separate notice boards.
The Year second, early thaw window 3 file remains open for its scheduled decision. The route clerks will publish a single shared interval before the next repair.
